SOLC vs. BTRN
SOLC (Canary Marinade Solana ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOLC is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
SOLC vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLC achieves a -40.57% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.29% return.
SOLC
- 1D
- -4.59%
- 1M
- -14.43%
- YTD
- -40.57%
- 6M
- -47.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- -18.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLC vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLC Canary Marinade Solana ETF | -40.57% | -11.89% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.29% | -0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLC and BTRN is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLC vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
SOLC
BTRN
SOLC vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Marinade Solana ETF (SOLC) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLC | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 0.00 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
SOLC vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLC drawdown since its inception was -50.08%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLC and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLC | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.08% | -36.97% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.08% | -25.29% | -24.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.95% | -14.41% | -14.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.68% | — |
Volatility
SOLC vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLC | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.53% | 19.91% | +51.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.53% | 30.96% | +40.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.53% | 30.96% | +40.57% |
SOLC vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLC vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
SOLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.60% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
SOLC Canary Marinade Solana ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLC and BTRN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOLC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOLC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.60%, compared with 0.00% for SOLC.
They also come from different issuers: Canary and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SOLC and 0.95% for BTRN.
Find the right allocation for SOLC and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer