SOFR vs. VGMS
SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) and VGMS (Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. SOFR is passively managed, while VGMS is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SOFR charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGMS.
Performance
SOFR vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOFR achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than VGMS's 1.06% return.
SOFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGMS
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOFR vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 1.45% | 2.33% |
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 1.06% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOFR and VGMS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOFR vs. VGMS — Risk / Return Rank
SOFR
VGMS
SOFR vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOFR | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOFR | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.96 | 2.11 | +2.85 |
Drawdowns
SOFR vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOFR drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum VGMS drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFR and VGMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOFR | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -2.46% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.39% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.31% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | — | — |
Volatility
SOFR vs. VGMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOFR | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 3.21% | -2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 3.21% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 3.21% | -2.37% |
SOFR vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOFR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOFR vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison
SOFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than VGMS's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 3.95% | 4.22% | 1.60% |
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 5.16% | 2.94% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOFR and VGMS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGMS.
VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 3.95% for SOFR.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SOFR and 0.30% for VGMS.
Find the right allocation for SOFR and VGMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer