SOFA vs. QTJL
SOFA (Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SOFA is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOFA charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
SOFA vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SOFA
- 1D
- -12.08%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOFA vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SOFA Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF | -42.83% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOFA and QTJL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOFA vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
SOFA
QTJL
SOFA vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOFA | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 0.52 | -1.30 |
Drawdowns
SOFA vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOFA drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFA and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOFA | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.39% | -33.40% | -17.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.83% | -0.01% | -42.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.68% | -7.94% | -24.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
SOFA vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOFA | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.09% | 10.01% | +98.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.09% | 20.42% | +87.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.09% | 20.42% | +87.67% |
SOFA vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOFA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOFA vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
SOFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% |
SOFA Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOFA and QTJL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for SOFA.
SOFA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for SOFA and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for SOFA and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer