PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOFA vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOFA vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SOFA

1D
5.24%
1M
10.37%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
3.10%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
-13.45%
6M
-4.04%
1Y
102.38%
3Y*
62.10%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*
-8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOFA vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SOFA and NUGT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOFA vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOFA

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOFA vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOFA vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOFANUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

-0.33

-0.42

Drawdowns

SOFA vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFA drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFA and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOFANUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-99.97%

+48.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.84%

-99.80%

+59.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-91.52%

+58.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.59%

Volatility

SOFA vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOFANUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.88%

90.00%

+17.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.88%

71.96%

+35.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.88%

87.89%

+19.99%

SOFA vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOFA vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

SOFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than NUGT's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.35%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%
SOFA
Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF
0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOFA and NUGT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOFA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOFA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.

SOFA has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.35% for NUGT.

SOFA tracks SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI), while NUGT tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for SOFA and 1.23% for NUGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOFA and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer