PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOFA vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOFA vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SOFA

1D
5.24%
1M
10.37%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-9.19%
1M
211.14%
YTD
841.05%
6M
460.44%
1Y
443.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOFA vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SOFA and ARMG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOFA vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOFA

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOFA vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOFA vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOFAARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

1.10

-1.86

Drawdowns

SOFA vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFA drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFA and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOFAARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-80.28%

+28.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.84%

-9.19%

-30.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-52.91%

+20.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.55%

Volatility

SOFA vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOFAARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

104.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.88%

130.67%

-22.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.88%

138.36%

-30.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.88%

138.36%

-30.48%

SOFA vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOFA vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

SOFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than ARMG's 0.52% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SOFA and ARMG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for SOFA.

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.37% for SOFA.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for SOFA and 0.75% for ARMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOFA and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer