SOEZ vs. IBLC
SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOEZ is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOEZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -40.75% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.
SOEZ
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -14.51%
- YTD
- -40.75%
- 6M
- -47.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 32.34%
- 6M
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 73.27%
- 3Y*
- 48.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -40.75% | -11.97% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 32.34% | -12.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOEZ and IBLC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOEZ vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
SOEZ
IBLC
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOEZ | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.07 | 0.40 | -1.47 |
Drawdowns
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -50.21%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOEZ | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.21% | -62.54% | +12.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.21% | -12.99% | -37.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -25.89% | -4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.56% | — |
Volatility
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOEZ | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.92% | 54.94% | +13.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.92% | 64.49% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.92% | 64.49% | +4.43% |
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOEZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than IBLC's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.77% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOEZ and IBLC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.57% for SOEZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOEZ and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for SOEZ and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer