SOEZ vs. IBLC
SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOEZ is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOEZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -45.57% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 21.51% return.
SOEZ
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -45.57%
- 6M
- -44.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -4.49%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- 21.51%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 46.13%
- 3Y*
- 43.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -45.57% | -11.69% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 21.51% | -9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOEZ and IBLC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOEZ vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
SOEZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBLC
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOEZ | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOEZ | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.14% | -62.54% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.26% | -20.11% | -34.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.76% | -25.75% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.92% | — |
Volatility
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOEZ | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.78% | 56.05% | +14.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.78% | 64.52% | +6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.78% | 64.52% | +6.26% |
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOEZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOEZ vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than IBLC's 5.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 5.15% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOEZ and IBLC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 1.01% for SOEZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOEZ and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for SOEZ and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer