SOEZ vs. ETHV
SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOEZ is actively managed, while ETHV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SOEZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.
Performance
SOEZ vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SOEZ having a -40.75% return and ETHV slightly higher at -39.43%.
SOEZ
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -14.51%
- YTD
- -40.75%
- 6M
- -47.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV
- 1D
- -5.70%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.69%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOEZ vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -40.75% | -11.97% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOEZ and ETHV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOEZ vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank
SOEZ
ETHV
SOEZ vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOEZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.07 | -0.41 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
SOEZ vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -50.21%, smaller than the maximum ETHV drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and ETHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOEZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.21% | -64.02% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -62.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.21% | -62.87% | +12.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -32.64% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.74% | — |
Volatility
SOEZ vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOEZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.92% | 68.43% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.92% | 72.30% | -3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.92% | 72.30% | -3.38% |
SOEZ vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOEZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SOEZ vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison
SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | 0.00% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOEZ and ETHV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ETHV.
SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOEZ and 0.20% for ETHV.
Find the right allocation for SOEZ and ETHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer