SOCL vs. ILCG
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while ILCG tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 8.36%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for ILCG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
SOCL vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -15.34% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 9.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 8.36%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- 6M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -15.34%
- 1Y
- -12.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- -6.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
ILCG
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.94%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.43%
SOCL vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -15.34% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 9.80% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -31.75% | 24.33% | 38.56% | 33.22% | 2.06% | 30.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and ILCG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SOCL and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
ILCG
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
ILCG
Technology
SOCL
ILCG
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
ILCG
Industrials
SOCL
ILCG
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
ILCG
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
ILCG
Energy
SOCL
-
ILCG
Financial Services
SOCL
-
ILCG
Healthcare
SOCL
-
ILCG
Real Estate
SOCL
-
ILCG
Utilities
SOCL
-
ILCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
ILCG
SOCL vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.17 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 1.07 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 3.58 | -4.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than ILCG's maximum drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -52.98% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -15.65% | -17.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -23.10% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.10% | -35.38% | -29.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -35.38% | -33.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.17% | -5.07% | -34.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -8.20% | -13.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.23% | 4.68% | +13.55% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) at 6.57%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 6.57% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.60% | 15.22% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.45% | 18.20% | +6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 22.32% | +7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 21.65% | +5.96% |
SOCL vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and ILCG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to ILCG (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs ILCG's -52.98%.
On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 17.43% vs 8.36% for SOCL. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCG has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 17.43% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
SOCL has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.04% for ILCG.
ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer