SOCL vs. ARKW
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. SOCL is passively managed, while ARKW is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for ARKW. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.
Performance
SOCL vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than ARKW's -6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed ARKW with an annualized return of 7.96%, while ARKW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.34% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
ARKW
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- -6.26%
- 6M
- -8.97%
- 1Y
- -4.08%
- 3Y*
- 36.01%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
SOCL vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -6.26% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and ARKW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SOCL and ARKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
ARKW
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
SOCL
ARKW
Technology
SOCL
ARKW
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
ARKW
-
Industrials
SOCL
ARKW
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
ARKW
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
ARKW
-
Energy
SOCL
-
ARKW
-
Financial Services
SOCL
-
ARKW
Healthcare
SOCL
-
ARKW
-
Real Estate
SOCL
-
ARKW
-
Utilities
SOCL
-
ARKW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
ARKW
SOCL vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.01 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.11 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -0.22 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and ARKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -80.52% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -36.21% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -36.21% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -77.36% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -80.52% | +11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -24.87% | -19.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -23.97% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 18.20% | -1.25% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) is 9.71%, while ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that SOCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 11.17% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 24.67% | -5.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 32.81% | -8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 43.65% | -13.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 37.78% | -10.18% |
SOCL vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ARKW's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.70% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and ARKW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to SOCL (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs ARKW's -80.52%.
On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.34% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, SOCL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SOCL has been the lower-risk option at 9.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.34% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOCL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and ARKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer