SNXX vs. QTJL
SNXX (Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNXX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
SNXX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNXX
- 1D
- -25.16%
- 1M
- -41.21%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
SNXX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | 539.76% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNXX and QTJL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNXX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
SNXX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTJL
SNXX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNXX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNXX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNXX drawdown since its inception was -56.01%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXX and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNXX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.01% | -33.40% | -22.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.62% | -2.39% | -52.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.15% | -7.78% | -9.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.32% | — |
Volatility
SNXX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNXX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.36% | 10.50% | +208.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.36% | 20.33% | +199.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.36% | 20.27% | +199.09% |
SNXX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNXX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNXX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNXX nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNXX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SNXX.
SNXX and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SNXX and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for SNXX and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer