SNXFX vs. YFSIX
SNXFX (Schwab 1000 Index Fund) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SNXFX returned 13.51%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for YFSIX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNXFX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.
Performance
SNXFX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 27.94% return.
SNXFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.29%
YFSIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 27.94%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 32.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SNXFX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 11.89% | 17.23% | 24.46% | 26.53% | -19.46% | 26.10% | 20.71% | 31.43% | -5.04% | 19.22% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 27.94% | 14.91% | -0.34% | 16.64% | -9.15% | 13.13% | 18.46% | 24.40% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNXFX and YFSIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SNXFX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNXFX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
SNXFX
YFSIX
SNXFX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNXFX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.31 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.28 | 7.30 | +7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNXFX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 1.54 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.59 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SNXFX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and YFSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNXFX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.08% | -35.10% | -19.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -14.20% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -14.20% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -25.14% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.24% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -4.90% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 4.47% | -2.54% |
Volatility
SNXFX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) is 2.87%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that SNXFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNXFX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 5.82% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 20.77% | -11.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 21.35% | -9.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 15.39% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 16.25% | +2.48% |
SNXFX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNXFX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.30% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 3.01% | 6.49% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 6.31% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNXFX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSIX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to SNXFX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.
SNXFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNXFX and YFSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer