PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNTH vs. XTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNTH vs. XTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNTH achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than XTR's 6.37% return.


SNTH

1D
-2.55%
1M
0.65%
YTD
7.95%
6M
6.47%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTR

1D
-2.51%
1M
0.50%
YTD
6.37%
6M
5.98%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNTH vs. XTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SNTH
MRP SynthEquity ETF
7.95%23.89%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
6.37%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SNTH and XTR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025

0.96

The correlation between SNTH and XTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNTH vs. XTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNTH
SNTH Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SNTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SNTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNTH Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XTR
XTR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNTH vs. XTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNTHXTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.48

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

10.52

-0.07

SNTH vs. XTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the XTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNTH and XTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNTHXTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.91

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.68

+1.01

Drawdowns

SNTH vs. XTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNTH drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum XTR drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTH and XTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNTHXTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-20.83%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-8.51%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-2.74%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-5.94%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.00%

+0.59%

Volatility

SNTH vs. XTR - Volatility Comparison

MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNTHXTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.77%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

8.57%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

11.06%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

13.82%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

13.82%

+1.86%

SNTH vs. XTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNTH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNTH vs. XTR - Dividend Comparison

SNTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, less than XTR's 16.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SNTH
MRP SynthEquity ETF
11.15%11.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
16.75%17.82%20.89%1.09%1.08%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SNTH and XTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNTH has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to XTR (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNTH dropped -9.79% vs XTR's -20.83%.

On 1-year performance, SNTH leads with 27.03% vs 20.97% for XTR. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XTR has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SNTH has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 20.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SNTH.

XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.75%, compared with 11.15% for SNTH.

They also come from different issuers: MRP and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SNTH and 0.25% for XTR.

SNTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNTH and XTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer