SNTH vs. SPY

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SNTH (MRP SynthEquity ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNTH is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by MRP, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. SNTH is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past year, SNTH returned 27.03% vs 25.79% for SPY. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNTH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.

Performance

SNTH vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNTH achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.45% return.

SNTH

• 1D: -2.55%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 6M: 6.47%
• 1Y: 27.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPY

• 1D: -2.58%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.18%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 21.43%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNTH vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	7.95%	23.89%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	8.45%	24.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SNTH and SPY is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025	0.95

The correlation between SNTH and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SNTH vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNTH

SNTH Risk / Return Rank: 66
SNTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SNTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SNTH Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SNTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SNTH Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SPY

SPY Risk / Return Rank: 66
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNTH vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNTH	SPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.14	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.88	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.39	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	2.92	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	13.50	-3.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNTH vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNTH and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNTH	SPY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	2.14	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.70	0.58	+1.12

Drawdowns

SNTH vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNTH drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTH and SPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNTH	SPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-55.19%	+45.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-8.88%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-2.90%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.95%	-9.05%	+7.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	1.91%	+0.68%

Volatility

SNTH vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.73%. This indicates that SNTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNTH	SPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	3.73%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	9.31%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	12.12%	+0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	17.09%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.68%	17.95%	-2.27%

SNTH vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNTH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNTH vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

SNTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, more than SPY's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	11.15%	11.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	1.00%	1.07%	1.21%	1.40%	1.65%	1.20%	1.52%	1.75%	2.04%	1.80%	2.03%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNTH and SPY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SNTH and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SNTH or SPY?

SNTH has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to SPY (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNTH dropped -9.79% vs SPY's -55.19%.

Which ETF is better, SNTH or SPY?

On 1-year performance, SNTH leads with 27.03% vs 25.79% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNTH or SPY?

Over the 1-year period, SNTH has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 25.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNTH or SPY?

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SNTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNTH or SPY?

SNTH has the higher dividend yield at 11.15%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.

What is the main difference between SNTH and SPY?

SNTH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: MRP and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SNTH and 0.09% for SPY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.