SNTH vs. QHDG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SNTH (MRP SynthEquity ETF) and QHDG (Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNTH returned 27.03% vs 11.53% for QHDG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNTH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QHDG.

Performance

SNTH vs. QHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNTH achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than QHDG's 0.92% return.

SNTH

• 1D: -2.55%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 6M: 6.47%
• 1Y: 27.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QHDG

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 11.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNTH vs. QHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	7.95%	23.89%
QHDG Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF	0.92%	17.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SNTH and QHDG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025	0.81

The correlation between SNTH and QHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SNTH vs. QHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNTH

SNTH Risk / Return Rank: 66
SNTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SNTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SNTH Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SNTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SNTH Martin Ratio Rank: 62

QHDG

QHDG Risk / Return Rank: 39
QHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
QHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
QHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
QHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNTH vs. QHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNTH	QHDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.32	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	1.79	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.26	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	1.65	+1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	5.64	+4.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNTH vs. QHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the QHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNTH and QHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNTH	QHDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	1.32	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.70	0.88	+0.81

Drawdowns

SNTH vs. QHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNTH drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum QHDG drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTH and QHDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNTH	QHDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-15.29%	+5.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-7.00%	-1.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-1.11%	-1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.95%	-2.15%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.05%	+0.54%

Volatility

SNTH vs. QHDG - Volatility Comparison

MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) at 0.25%. This indicates that SNTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNTH	QHDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	0.25%	+3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	6.51%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	8.78%	+3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	12.41%	+3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.68%	12.41%	+3.27%

SNTH vs. QHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNTH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QHDG's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNTH vs. QHDG - Dividend Comparison

SNTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, while QHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QHDG Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	11.15%	11.55%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNTH and QHDG in my portfolio?

SNTH and QHDG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNTH or QHDG?

SNTH has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to QHDG (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNTH dropped -9.79% vs QHDG's -15.29%.

Which ETF is better, SNTH or QHDG?

On 1-year performance, SNTH leads with 27.03% vs 11.53% for QHDG. On fees, QHDG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QHDG has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNTH or QHDG?

Over the 1-year period, SNTH has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNTH or QHDG?

QHDG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SNTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNTH or QHDG?

SNTH has the higher dividend yield at 11.15%, compared with 0.00% for QHDG.

What is the main difference between SNTH and QHDG?

They also come from different issuers: MRP and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SNTH and 0.79% for QHDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.