PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QHDG vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QHDG vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QHDG achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


QHDG

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.89%
YTD
1.03%
6M
0.25%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QHDG vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QHDG
Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF
1.03%12.13%6.35%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QHDG and DBE is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.07

The correlation between QHDG and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QHDG vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QHDG
QHDG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
QHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QHDG vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QHDGDBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

2.43

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

2.96

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

5.89

-4.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.69

11.53

-5.84

QHDG vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QHDG and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QHDGDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.43

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.09

+0.80

Drawdowns

QHDG vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHDG and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QHDGDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

-86.69%

+71.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-14.41%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-30.27%

+29.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-57.31%

+55.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

7.35%

-5.30%

Volatility

QHDG vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) is 0.26%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that QHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QHDGDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

12.95%

-12.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.54%

30.86%

-24.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.79%

34.97%

-26.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.44%

29.39%

-16.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.44%

28.33%

-15.89%

QHDG vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QHDG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

QHDG vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

QHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
QHDG
Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QHDG and DBE have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to QHDG (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QHDG dropped -15.29% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 84.41% vs 11.61% for QHDG. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, QHDG has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 84.41% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QHDG.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for QHDG.

QHDG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QHDG and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QHDG and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer