SNTH vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SNTH (MRP SynthEquity ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNTH is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by MRP, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNTH returned 22.15% vs 2.89% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SNTH charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

SNTH vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNTH achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.20% return.

SNTH

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 6.58%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 22.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNTH vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	6.58%	24.27%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.20%	2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SNTH and BAMU is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

SNTH vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNTH

SNTH Risk / Return Rank: 56
SNTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SNTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SNTH Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SNTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SNTH Martin Ratio Rank: 55

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 99
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNTH vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNTH	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	4.98	-3.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	8.77	-6.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	2.42	-1.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	24.55	-22.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	97.21	-88.86

SNTH vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNTH and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNTH vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNTH drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTH and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNTH	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-0.36%	-9.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-0.12%	-8.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	0.00%	-4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-0.02%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	0.03%	+2.63%

Volatility

SNTH vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.08%. This indicates that SNTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNTH	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	0.08%	+5.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	0.39%	+9.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.09%	0.58%	+12.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.81%	0.86%	+14.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.81%	0.86%	+14.95%

SNTH vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNTH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNTH vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

SNTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	11.29%	11.55%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNTH and BAMU in my portfolio?

SNTH and BAMU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNTH or BAMU?

SNTH has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to BAMU (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNTH dropped -9.79% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, SNTH or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, SNTH leads with 22.15% vs 2.89% for BAMU. On fees, SNTH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNTH or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, SNTH has performed better with a 22.15% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNTH or BAMU?

SNTH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNTH or BAMU?

SNTH has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between SNTH and BAMU?

SNTH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: MRP and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SNTH and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.