PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNSAX vs. FCFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNSAX vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Fund (SNSAX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSAX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than FCFAX's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SNSAX has underperformed FCFAX with an annualized return of 2.83%, while FCFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.69% annualized return.


SNSAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.35%
6M
1.50%
YTD
2.23%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
2.83%
ALL TIME*
2.51%

FCFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.65%
6M
0.37%
YTD
1.05%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
4.69%
ALL TIME*
4.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SNSAX vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNSAX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Fund
2.23%6.29%5.12%4.67%-3.55%2.35%2.72%6.25%-0.26%2.81%
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
1.05%5.21%8.01%11.23%-7.83%5.07%6.22%6.95%0.89%7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSAX and FCFAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.48

The correlation between SNSAX and FCFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNSAX vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNSAX
SNSAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SNSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SNSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FCFAX
FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNSAX vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Fund (SNSAX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNSAXFCFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.26

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

1.71

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

6.01

+7.98

SNSAX vs. FCFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the FCFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSAX and FCFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNSAX vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSAX drawdown since its inception was -12.22%, smaller than the maximum FCFAX drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSAX and FCFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNSAXFCFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.22%

-16.33%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

-1.82%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.96%

-2.82%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.87%

-10.49%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.87%

-16.33%

+9.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.86%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-1.51%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.52%

-0.17%

Volatility

SNSAX vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Fund (SNSAX) is 0.47%, while Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) has a volatility of 0.65%. This indicates that SNSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNSAXFCFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.65%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

1.81%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81%

2.26%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

2.79%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.57%

3.20%

-0.63%

SNSAX vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNSAX vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison

SNSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than FCFAX's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
6.35%6.10%5.76%5.93%5.00%3.65%3.69%4.62%5.05%5.85%4.84%4.95%
SNSAX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Fund
3.16%3.19%4.20%3.08%3.74%3.47%1.88%2.40%1.81%1.85%1.19%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNSAX and FCFAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCFAX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to SNSAX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSAX dropped -12.22% vs FCFAX's -16.33%.

SNSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNSAX and FCFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer