SNPG vs. OUSA
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA).
SNPG and OUSA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SNPG is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2022. OUSA is a passively managed fund by O'Shares Investments that tracks the performance of the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 14, 2015. Both SNPG and OUSA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SNPG vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SNPG vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF | -9.20% | 18.22% | 33.99% | 38.45% | 1.81% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | -3.17% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | 4.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNPG achieves a -9.20% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's -3.17% return.
SNPG
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OUSA
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -6.28%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- 1Y
- 6.15%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SNPG vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SNPG vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
SNPG
OUSA
SNPG vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPG | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.45 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 0.74 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.10 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 0.75 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | 3.10 | +1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPG | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.45 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.66 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPG and OUSA is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SNPG vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than OUSA's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.95% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.46% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
SNPG vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and OUSA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPG | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.69% | -33.12% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -9.80% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.11% | -6.65% | -3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -3.53% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.39% | +0.98% |
Volatility
SNPG vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.78%. This indicates that SNPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SNPG | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 3.78% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 7.27% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.33% | 13.88% | +6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 13.31% | +4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 15.15% | +2.93% |