SNPG vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SNPG returned 29.68% vs 211.40% for CHPS. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

SNPG vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPG achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 103.69% return.

SNPG

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 25.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 23.46%
• YTD: 103.69%
• 6M: 107.58%
• 1Y: 211.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPG vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	11.36%	18.22%	33.99%	6.74%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	103.69%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPG and CHPS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.70

The correlation between SNPG and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNPG vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNPG	CHPS
Technology	36.1%	98.8%
Communication Services	19.4%	-
Financial Services	12.8%	0.2%
Industrials	10.5%	0.4%
Healthcare	9.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	0.5%
Utilities	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

SNPG vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPG

SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 59
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPG vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNPG	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	6.17	-4.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	5.85	-2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.78	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	12.16	-9.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	47.22	-37.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNPG vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPG and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNPG	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	6.17	-4.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	1.77	-0.14

Drawdowns

SNPG vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPG	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.69%	-39.44%	+17.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-17.50%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.06%	+2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-9.15%	+6.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	4.50%	-1.35%

Volatility

SNPG vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) is 4.71%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that SNPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPG	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	14.07%	-9.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.43%	28.29%	-16.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	34.50%	-20.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	33.78%	-15.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	33.78%	-15.78%

SNPG vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNPG and CHPS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNPG vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than CHPS's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	0.46%	0.49%	0.57%	0.95%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPG and CHPS in my portfolio?

SNPG and CHPS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPG or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to SNPG (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPG dropped -21.69% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, SNPG or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 211.40% vs 29.68% for SNPG. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SNPG has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPG or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 211.40% return vs 29.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPG or CHPS?

SNPG and CHPS have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPG or CHPS?

SNPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.33% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between SNPG and CHPS?

SNPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.17 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.