PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPE vs. RSPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPE vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPE achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 32.62% return.


SNPE

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.92%
YTD
10.55%
6M
11.45%
1Y
32.05%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*

RSPG

1D
1.27%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
32.62%
6M
30.32%
1Y
47.99%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
20.91%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPE vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SNPE
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF
10.55%18.56%23.85%27.79%-17.67%31.43%19.84%12.92%
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
32.62%7.01%6.09%4.49%57.97%57.73%-32.44%0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPE and RSPG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.39

The correlation between SNPE and RSPG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SNPE vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNPE
RSPG

Technology

38.6%

-

Communication Services

14.5%

-

Financial Services

12.1%
0.0%

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Industrials

6.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%

-

Energy

4.2%
100.0%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Utilities

0.8%

-

Technology

SNPE
38.6%
RSPG

-

Communication Services

SNPE
14.5%
RSPG

-

Financial Services

SNPE
12.1%
RSPG
0.0%

Healthcare

SNPE
9.3%
RSPG

-

Industrials

SNPE
6.9%
RSPG

-

Consumer Defensive

SNPE
5.1%
RSPG

-

Consumer Cyclical

SNPE
4.6%
RSPG

-

Energy

SNPE
4.2%
RSPG
100.0%

Real Estate

SNPE
2.2%
RSPG

-

Basic Materials

SNPE
1.9%
RSPG

-

Utilities

SNPE
0.8%
RSPG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPE vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPE
SNPE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SNPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPG
RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPE vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNPERSPGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

2.23

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

2.82

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

4.13

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.08

12.26

+3.82

SNPE vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the RSPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPE and RSPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNPERSPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.23

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.74

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.18

+0.71

Drawdowns

SNPE vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPE and RSPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPERSPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-79.98%

+46.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-12.18%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-23.06%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

-28.44%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-6.83%

+6.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-25.47%

+20.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

4.10%

-2.06%

Volatility

SNPE vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) is 3.21%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that SNPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPERSPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

8.19%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

16.75%

-7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

21.70%

-9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

28.31%

-11.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

33.57%

-13.90%

SNPE vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNPE vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than RSPG's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
1.97%2.60%2.43%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%
SNPE
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF
0.91%1.01%1.17%1.32%1.65%1.08%1.42%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNPE and RSPG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPG has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to SNPE (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPE dropped -33.37% vs RSPG's -79.98%.

On 5-year performance, RSPG leads with 20.91% vs 14.83% for SNPE. On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SNPE has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RSPG has performed better with a 20.91% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.91% for SNPE.

SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SNPE and 0.40% for RSPG.

SNPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPE and RSPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer