PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPE vs. DGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPE vs. DGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPE achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly higher than DGZ's 2.71% return.


SNPE

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.56%
YTD
9.73%
6M
10.34%
1Y
30.35%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*

DGZ

1D
4.82%
1M
16.59%
YTD
2.71%
6M
4.61%
1Y
-15.32%
3Y*
-16.62%
5Y*
-10.05%
10Y*
-8.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPE vs. DGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SNPE
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF
9.73%18.56%23.85%27.79%-17.67%31.43%19.84%12.92%
DGZ
DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes
2.71%-32.55%-16.46%-4.75%4.93%1.53%-20.80%-6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPE and DGZ is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPE vs. DGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPE
SNPE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SNPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DGZ
DGZ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPE vs. DGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNPEDGZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.01

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

-0.40

+3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.89

-0.70

+15.60

SNPE vs. DGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the DGZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPE and DGZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNPEDGZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

-0.23

+2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

-0.29

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

-0.31

+1.19

Drawdowns

SNPE vs. DGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum DGZ drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPE and DGZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPEDGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-86.32%

+52.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-38.32%

+28.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-59.54%

+40.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

-61.54%

+36.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-82.41%

+81.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-57.74%

+52.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

21.80%

-19.76%

Volatility

SNPE vs. DGZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) is 3.30%, while DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) has a volatility of 45.00%. This indicates that SNPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPEDGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

45.00%

-41.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

54.96%

-45.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

66.38%

-54.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

35.24%

-18.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

27.40%

-7.73%

SNPE vs. DGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DGZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNPE vs. DGZ - Dividend Comparison

SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while DGZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DGZ
DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SNPE
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF
0.91%1.01%1.17%1.32%1.65%1.08%1.42%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNPE and DGZ have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGZ has higher volatility (45.00%) compared to SNPE (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPE dropped -33.37% vs DGZ's -86.32%.

On 5-year performance, SNPE leads with 14.46% vs -10.05% for DGZ. On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SNPE has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SNPE has performed better with a 14.46% return vs -10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGZ.

SNPE has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for DGZ.

SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while DGZ is Inverse Commodities. SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while DGZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SNPE and 0.75% for DGZ.

SNPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPE and DGZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer