SNPD vs. WTV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. SNPD is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNPD returned 9.24%/yr vs 21.15%/yr for WTV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.

Performance

SNPD vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SNPD having a 9.90% return and WTV slightly lower at 9.70%.

SNPD

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 16.80%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WTV

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 8.81%
• 1Y: 23.03%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPD vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	9.90%	6.66%	5.41%	2.68%	3.49%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	9.70%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and WTV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.85

The correlation between SNPD and WTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNPD vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNPD	WTV
Consumer Defensive	18.8%	9.9%
Industrials	16.9%	10.3%
Utilities	14.3%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	10.6%
Financial Services	8.0%	18.5%
Technology	7.3%	18.3%
Basic Materials	7.2%	2.2%
Real Estate	6.8%	5.4%
Healthcare	5.0%	7.5%
Communication Services	3.4%	6.5%
Energy	3.1%	6.4%

Return for Risk

SNPD vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 42
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 38

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 62
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPD vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNPD	WTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.94	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.83	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.35	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	3.24	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.77	10.49	-4.72

SNPD vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and WTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and WTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPD	WTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-42.18%	+26.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-7.15%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	-18.49%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-1.87%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-5.03%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	2.20%	+0.72%

Volatility

SNPD vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 3.11%, while WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPD	WTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	3.64%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	8.20%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.15%	11.92%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.12%	17.08%	-3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	20.17%	-7.05%

SNPD vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNPD vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than WTV's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.30%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.66%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPD and WTV in my portfolio?

SNPD and WTV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPD or WTV?

WTV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to SNPD (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs WTV's -42.18%.

Which ETF is better, SNPD or WTV?

On 3-year performance, WTV leads with 21.15% vs 9.24% for SNPD. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPD or WTV?

Over the 3-year period, WTV has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPD or WTV?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPD or WTV?

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 1.66% for WTV.

What is the main difference between SNPD and WTV?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.12% for WTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.