SNPD vs. RNIN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and RNIN (Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. SNPD is passively managed, while RNIN is actively managed. Over the past year, SNPD returned 13.67% vs 28.56% for RNIN. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for RNIN.

Performance

SNPD vs. RNIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than RNIN's 15.93% return.

SNPD

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: 8.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RNIN

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 15.93%
• 6M: 14.64%
• 1Y: 28.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPD vs. RNIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	8.10%	5.17%
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	15.93%	10.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and RNIN is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025	0.68

The correlation between SNPD and RNIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SNPD vs. RNIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 33
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 32

RNIN

RNIN Risk / Return Rank: 70
RNIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RNIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
RNIN Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RNIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RNIN Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPD vs. RNIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNPD	RNIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.93	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.82	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.34	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	5.04	-3.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.72	17.82	-13.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNPD vs. RNIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the RNIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and RNIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNPD	RNIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	1.93	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.78	-1.20

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. RNIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, which is greater than RNIN's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and RNIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPD	RNIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-5.70%	-10.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-5.70%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.20%	-2.55%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.94%	-1.24%	-2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	1.61%	+1.29%

Volatility

SNPD vs. RNIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 2.75%, while Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPD	RNIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	4.94%	-2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	10.50%	-2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.05%	14.87%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	14.97%	-1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	14.97%	-1.83%

SNPD vs. RNIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RNIN's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNPD vs. RNIN - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than RNIN's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	0.76%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.01%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPD and RNIN in my portfolio?

SNPD and RNIN have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPD or RNIN?

RNIN has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to SNPD (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs RNIN's -5.70%.

Which ETF is better, SNPD or RNIN?

On 1-year performance, RNIN leads with 28.56% vs 13.67% for SNPD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPD or RNIN?

Over the 1-year period, RNIN has performed better with a 28.56% return vs 13.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPD or RNIN?

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RNIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPD or RNIN?

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.76% for RNIN.

What is the main difference between SNPD and RNIN?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Bushido. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.68% for RNIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.