SNPD vs. EPMV
SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and EPMV (Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. SNPD is passively managed, while EPMV is actively managed. Over the past year, SNPD returned 13.67% vs 29.98% for EPMV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPMV.
Performance
SNPD vs. EPMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than EPMV's 18.43% return.
SNPD
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPMV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 6.82%
- YTD
- 18.43%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- 1Y
- 29.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNPD vs. EPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.10% | 7.64% |
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF | 18.43% | 13.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPD and EPMV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SNPD and EPMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNPD vs. EPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNPD
EPMV
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
SNPD
EPMV
Industrials
SNPD
EPMV
Utilities
SNPD
EPMV
Consumer Cyclical
SNPD
EPMV
Financial Services
SNPD
EPMV
Basic Materials
SNPD
EPMV
Real Estate
SNPD
EPMV
Technology
SNPD
EPMV
Healthcare
SNPD
EPMV
Communication Services
SNPD
EPMV
-
Energy
SNPD
EPMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPD vs. EPMV — Risk / Return Rank
SNPD
EPMV
SNPD vs. EPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPD | EPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 3.43 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 11.30 | -6.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPD | EPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.99 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 2.05 | -1.48 |
Drawdowns
SNPD vs. EPMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, which is greater than EPMV's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and EPMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPD | EPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -8.78% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -8.78% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | 0.00% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -1.78% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.66% | +0.24% |
Volatility
SNPD vs. EPMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 2.75%, while Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPD | EPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 5.29% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 11.33% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.05% | 15.19% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 15.48% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 15.48% | -2.34% |
SNPD vs. EPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EPMV's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNPD vs. EPMV - Dividend Comparison
SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than EPMV's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.25% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.01% | 3.10% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNPD and EPMV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPMV has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to SNPD (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs EPMV's -8.78%.
On 1-year performance, EPMV leads with 29.98% vs 13.67% for SNPD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPMV has performed better with a 29.98% return vs 13.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.
SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.25% for EPMV.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.88% for EPMV.
EPMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNPD and EPMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer