MARO vs. MSTY
MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MARO returned -20.97% vs -57.30% for MSTY. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MARO vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARO achieves a 30.77% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -8.55% return.
MARO
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 17.99%
- YTD
- 30.77%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- -20.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -8.50%
- 1M
- -20.82%
- YTD
- -8.55%
- 6M
- -19.25%
- 1Y
- -57.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARO vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.77% | -48.05% | -19.61% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.55% | -42.71% | -16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARO and MSTY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between MARO and MSTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARO vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
MARO
MSTY
MARO vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARO | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | -0.96 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | -1.53 | +1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.83 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | -0.79 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | -1.22 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARO | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | -0.96 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.52 | 0.31 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
MARO vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARO drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARO and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARO | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.75% | -71.79% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.51% | -71.79% | +6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.17% | -64.04% | +13.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.95% | -26.01% | -15.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.49% | 46.68% | -8.19% |
Volatility
MARO vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) is 11.33%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that MARO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARO | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 16.65% | -5.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.34% | 48.38% | -2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.48% | 60.11% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.22% | 71.83% | -6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.22% | 71.83% | -6.61% |
MARO vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MARO and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MARO vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
MARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 179.92%, less than MSTY's 251.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 179.92% | 277.68% | 0.00% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 251.24% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARO and MSTY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to MARO (11.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARO dropped -71.75% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, MARO leads with -20.97% vs -57.30% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MARO has been the lower-risk option at 11.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MARO has performed better with a -20.97% return vs -57.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MARO and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 251.24%, compared with 179.92% for MARO.
MARO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARO and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer