SNOW vs. MTDR
SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) and MTDR (Matador Resources Company) are both stocks. SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology), while MTDR operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, SNOW returned -0.60%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for MTDR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNOW vs. MTDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly lower than MTDR's 22.72% return.
SNOW
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- YTD
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- —
MTDR
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- 6M
- 23.27%
- YTD
- 22.72%
- 1Y
- 0.99%
- 3Y*
- 0.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
SNOW vs. MTDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 19.19% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 14.86% |
MTDR Matador Resources Company | 22.72% | -22.31% | 0.37% | 0.57% | 55.83% | 207.33% | 39.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOW and MTDR is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.13 |
The correlation between SNOW and MTDR shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SNOW:
$90.62B
MTDR:
$6.38B
SNOW:
-$3.53
MTDR:
$3.89
SNOW:
17.63
MTDR:
1.90
SNOW:
43.82
MTDR:
1.14
SNOW:
$5.03B
MTDR:
$3.36B
SNOW:
$3.38B
MTDR:
$3.43B
SNOW:
-$1.21B
MTDR:
$1.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOW vs. MTDR — Risk / Return Rank
SNOW
MTDR
SNOW vs. MTDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Matador Resources Company (MTDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNOW | MTDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.04 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.06 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 0.12 | +0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNOW vs. MTDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, smaller than the maximum MTDR drawdown of -96.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and MTDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOW | MTDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.99% | -96.50% | +23.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.30% | -28.76% | -27.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.30% | -46.83% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.99% | -48.29% | -24.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.94% | -24.81% | -10.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -25.07% | -23.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.10% | 14.27% | +11.83% |
Volatility
SNOW vs. MTDR - Volatility Comparison
Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to Matador Resources Company (MTDR) at 9.39%. This indicates that SNOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOW | MTDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.19% | 9.39% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.30% | 30.06% | +23.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.06% | 40.37% | +25.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.97% | 47.08% | +14.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.49% | 64.91% | -2.42% |
Dividends
SNOW vs. MTDR - Dividend Comparison
SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTDR Matador Resources Company | 2.80% | 3.09% | 1.51% | 1.14% | 0.52% | 0.34% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SNOW vs. MTDR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snowflake Inc. and Matador Resources Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNOW vs. MTDR - Profitability Comparison
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
MTDR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matador Resources Company reported a gross profit of 564.11M and revenue of 671.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.0%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
MTDR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matador Resources Company reported an operating income of 46.82M and revenue of 671.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
MTDR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matador Resources Company reported a net income of -35.87M and revenue of 671.64M, resulting in a net margin of -5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOW and MTDR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (12.19%) compared to MTDR (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs MTDR's -96.50%.
SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOW and MTDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer