PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOW vs. MA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNOW vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than MA's -14.65% return.


SNOW

1D
0.92%
1M
57.72%
YTD
9.61%
6M
6.72%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*

MA

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
-14.65%
6M
-9.84%
1Y
-17.21%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
18.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOW vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
9.61%42.06%-22.41%38.64%-57.63%20.38%10.82%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-14.65%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%4.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOW and MA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.27

The correlation between SNOW and MA shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNOW:

$83.05B

MA:

$433.70B

EPS

SNOW:

-$3.53

MA:

$17.28

PS Ratio

SNOW:

16.21

MA:

12.90

PB Ratio

SNOW:

40.30

MA:

64.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNOW:

$5.03B

MA:

$33.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNOW:

$3.38B

MA:

$26.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNOW:

-$1.21B

MA:

$21.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOW vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOW
SNOW Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOW vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNOWMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.88

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

-0.83

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

-1.68

+2.22

SNOW vs. MA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the MA Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOW and MA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNOWMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

-0.78

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.28

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.83

-0.85

Drawdowns

SNOW vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and MA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOWMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.99%

-62.67%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.30%

-20.91%

-35.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.30%

-20.91%

-35.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.99%

-28.25%

-44.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.17%

-18.55%

-21.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.08%

-9.82%

-39.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.86%

10.26%

+15.60%

Volatility

SNOW vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a higher volatility of 35.49% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 6.33%. This indicates that SNOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOWMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.49%

6.33%

+29.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.71%

17.37%

+35.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.40%

22.28%

+43.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.91%

23.99%

+37.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.75%

26.93%

+35.82%

Dividends

SNOW vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.67%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SNOW vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snowflake Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
1.39B
8.40B
(SNOW) Total Revenue
(MA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SNOW vs. MA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Snowflake Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
66.6%
58.4%
Portfolio components
SNOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

SNOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

SNOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNOW and MA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOW has higher volatility (35.49%) compared to MA (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs MA's -62.67%.

SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOW and MA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer