PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOW vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNOW vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.92% return.


SNOW

1D
0.92%
1M
57.72%
YTD
9.61%
6M
6.72%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*

CRM

1D
-1.68%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-30.92%
6M
-29.37%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
-4.89%
5Y*
-4.74%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOW vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
9.61%42.06%-22.41%38.64%-57.63%20.38%10.82%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-30.92%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%-11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOW and CRM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.54

The correlation between SNOW and CRM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNOW:

$83.05B

CRM:

$159.00B

EPS

SNOW:

-$3.53

CRM:

$8.59

PS Ratio

SNOW:

16.21

CRM:

3.98

PB Ratio

SNOW:

40.30

CRM:

4.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNOW:

$5.03B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNOW:

$3.38B

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNOW:

-$1.21B

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOW vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOW
SNOW Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOW vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNOWCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.86

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

-0.84

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

-1.62

+2.17

SNOW vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOW and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNOWCRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

-0.88

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.13

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.45

-0.46

Drawdowns

SNOW vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, roughly equal to the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOWCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.99%

-70.50%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.30%

-39.36%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.30%

-54.70%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.99%

-58.62%

-14.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.17%

-49.87%

+9.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.08%

-16.12%

-32.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.86%

20.48%

+5.38%

Volatility

SNOW vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a higher volatility of 35.49% compared to Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) at 16.96%. This indicates that SNOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOWCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.49%

16.96%

+18.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.71%

31.74%

+20.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.40%

37.87%

+27.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.91%

37.02%

+24.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.75%

35.36%

+27.39%

Dividends

SNOW vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.92%0.63%0.48%
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SNOW vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snowflake Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
1.39B
11.13B
(SNOW) Total Revenue
(CRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SNOW vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Snowflake Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
66.6%
76.9%
Portfolio components
SNOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

SNOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

SNOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNOW and CRM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOW has higher volatility (35.49%) compared to CRM (16.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs CRM's -70.50%.

SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOW and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer