PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOW vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOW vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.67% return.


SNOW

1D
1.69%
1M
33.80%
YTD
5.04%
6M
2.36%
1Y
7.81%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
-1.72%
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOW vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
5.04%42.06%-22.41%38.64%-57.63%20.38%14.86%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.67%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOW and BIL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOW vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOW
SNOW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOW vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNOWBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-171.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

87.16

-86.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

352.24

-352.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

2,793.11

-2,792.81

SNOW vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOW and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNOW vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOWBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.99%

-0.78%

-72.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.30%

-0.01%

-56.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.30%

-0.01%

-56.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.99%

-0.09%

-72.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.67%

0.00%

-42.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-0.26%

-48.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.06%

0.00%

+26.06%

Volatility

SNOW vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a higher volatility of 35.88% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that SNOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOWBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.88%

0.07%

+35.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.67%

0.14%

+52.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.50%

0.20%

+65.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.95%

0.26%

+61.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.58%

0.26%

+62.32%

Dividends

SNOW vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOW and BIL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOW has higher volatility (35.88%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs BIL's -0.78%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOW and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer