SNOV vs. UXJL
SNOV (FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNOV charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
SNOV vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOV achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
SNOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOV vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November | 7.65% | 5.73% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOV and UXJL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOV vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
SNOV
UXJL
SNOV vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNOV | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNOV | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.87 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
SNOV vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.36%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOV and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOV | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.36% | -10.29% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.76% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -1.51% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | — | — |
Volatility
SNOV vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOV | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.90% | 13.90% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 13.90% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 13.90% | -2.76% |
SNOV vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNOV has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNOV vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNOV nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOV and UXJL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UXJL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UXJL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SNOV.
SNOV and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SNOV and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for SNOV and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer