PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOV vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOV vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOV achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.


SNOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.60%
YTD
7.65%
6M
7.78%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOV vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNOV and UXJL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOV vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOV
SNOV Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

UXJL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOV vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNOVUXJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

SNOV vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNOVUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.87

-0.80

Drawdowns

SNOV vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.36%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOV and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOVUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.36%

-10.29%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.76%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-1.51%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

Volatility

SNOV vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOVUXJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

13.90%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.14%

13.90%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.14%

13.90%

-2.76%

SNOV vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOV has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNOV vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNOV nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOV and UXJL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UXJL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UXJL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SNOV.

SNOV and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SNOV and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOV and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer