SNOV vs. IGLD
SNOV (FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November) and IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNOV is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNOV returned 17.37% vs 24.53% for IGLD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNOV charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.
Performance
SNOV vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOV achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's 1.69% return.
SNOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLD
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SNOV vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November | 7.65% | 7.01% | 9.19% | 5.62% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 1.69% | 47.46% | 19.36% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOV and IGLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOV vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank
SNOV
IGLD
SNOV vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNOV | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 1.40 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 3.82 | +5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNOV | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.06 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.94 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
SNOV vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.36%, smaller than the maximum IGLD drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOV and IGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOV | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.36% | -18.59% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -17.56% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -15.16% | +14.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -5.24% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 6.43% | -4.59% |
Volatility
SNOV vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) is 1.69%, while FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that SNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOV | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 5.12% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.08% | 21.01% | -14.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.90% | 23.24% | -12.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 15.17% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 15.00% | -3.86% |
SNOV vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNOV has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNOV vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison
SNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 17.92% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% |
SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOV and IGLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGLD has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to SNOV (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOV dropped -15.36% vs IGLD's -18.59%.
On 1-year performance, IGLD leads with 24.53% vs 17.37% for SNOV. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 24.53% return vs 17.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SNOV.
IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 0.00% for SNOV.
SNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IGLD is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SNOV and 0.85% for IGLD.
SNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOV and IGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer