SNOU vs. CDL

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

SNOU (T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF) and CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNOU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while CDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. SNOU is actively managed, while CDL is passively managed. Over the past year, SNOU returned -25.99% vs 19.87% for CDL. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SNOU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CDL.

Performance

SNOU vs. CDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOU achieves a -17.00% return, which is significantly lower than CDL's 12.18% return.

SNOU

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: 75.74%
• YTD: -17.00%
• 6M: -19.71%
• 1Y: -25.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CDL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 12.29%
• 1Y: 19.87%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 10.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOU vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNOU T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF	-17.00%	63.07%
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	12.18%	9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOU and CDL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

SNOU vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOU

SNOU Risk / Return Rank: 9
SNOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SNOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SNOU Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SNOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SNOU Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CDL

CDL Risk / Return Rank: 68
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOU vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOU	CDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	2.06	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	3.01	-2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.35	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	3.61	-3.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	12.77	-13.33

SNOU vs. CDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the CDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOU and CDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOU vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOU drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, which is greater than CDL's maximum drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOU and CDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOU	CDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.17%	-41.03%	-43.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.17%	-5.66%	-78.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.07%	-1.91%	-49.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.95%	-4.33%	-28.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.26%	1.60%	+44.66%

Volatility

SNOU vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) has a higher volatility of 66.32% compared to VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) at 3.35%. This indicates that SNOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOU	CDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	66.32%	3.35%	+62.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	103.19%	7.09%	+96.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	132.16%	9.93%	+122.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.40%	13.85%	+113.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.40%	17.05%	+110.35%

SNOU vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CDL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOU vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison

SNOU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, more than CDL's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	3.18%	3.33%	3.27%	3.61%	3.31%	2.60%	3.32%	3.04%	3.32%	2.87%	2.97%	1.28%
SNOU T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF	7.20%	5.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOU and CDL in my portfolio?

SNOU and CDL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOU or CDL?

SNOU has higher volatility (66.32%) compared to CDL (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOU dropped -84.17% vs CDL's -41.03%.

Which ETF is better, SNOU or CDL?

On 1-year performance, CDL leads with 19.87% vs -25.99% for SNOU. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOU or CDL?

Over the 1-year period, CDL has performed better with a 19.87% return vs -25.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOU or CDL?

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNOU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOU or CDL?

SNOU has the higher dividend yield at 7.20%, compared with 3.18% for CDL.

What is the main difference between SNOU and CDL?

SNOU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNOU and 0.35% for CDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.