PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOU vs. BBSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOU vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOU achieves a 27.31% return, which is significantly higher than BBSB's 0.77% return.


SNOU

1D
-3.66%
1M
25.24%
6M
67.03%
YTD
27.31%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
77.93%

BBSB

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.07%
6M
0.57%
YTD
0.77%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$122.97K$97.67K$393.59K
$5.27M$4.01M$7.58M

SNOU vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNOU and BBSB is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOU vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNOU
SNOU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SNOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOU Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSB
BBSB Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BBSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNOU vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNOUBBSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.49

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

3.62

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.09

14.41

-14.32

SNOU vs. BBSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOU Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the BBSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOU and BBSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNOU vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOU drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, which is greater than BBSB's maximum drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOU and BBSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOUBBSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.17%

-1.57%

-82.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.17%

-0.86%

-83.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.96%

-0.06%

-24.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.45%

-0.30%

-33.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.98%

0.21%

+47.77%

Volatility

SNOU vs. BBSB - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) has a higher volatility of 19.50% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) at 0.35%. This indicates that SNOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOUBBSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.50%

0.35%

+19.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.92%

0.95%

+101.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.19%

1.28%

+132.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

124.08%

1.65%

+122.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

124.08%

1.65%

+122.43%

SNOU vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNOU vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison

SNOU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than BBSB's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBSB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF
3.45%3.69%4.84%3.50%
SNOU
T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF
4.69%5.97%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOU and BBSB have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOU has higher volatility (19.50%) compared to BBSB (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOU dropped -84.17% vs BBSB's -1.57%.

On 1-year performance, SNOU leads with 24.96% vs 2.59% for BBSB. On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SNOU has performed better with a 24.96% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNOU.

SNOU has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 3.45% for BBSB.

SNOU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BBSB is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNOU and 0.04% for BBSB.

BBSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOU and BBSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer