PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNDK vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNDK vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNDK achieves a 494.44% return, which is significantly higher than NRGU's 118.00% return.


SNDK

1D
-12.63%
1M
-29.15%
6M
244.81%
YTD
494.44%
1Y
3,311.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NRGU

1D
3.84%
1M
18.77%
6M
86.19%
YTD
118.00%
1Y
119.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDK vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
494.44%356.50%
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
118.00%-27.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDK and NRGU is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

0.05

The correlation between SNDK and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNDK vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNDK
SNDK Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SNDK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDK Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDK Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNDK vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNDKNRGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+29.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.26

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

84.92

2.73

+82.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

293.95

6.13

+287.82

SNDK vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNDK Sharpe Ratio is 30.88, which is higher than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNDK and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNDK vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDK drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDK and NRGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNDKNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-57.50%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.57%

-43.89%

+4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.57%

-24.81%

-14.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-26.06%

+12.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.41%

19.53%

-8.12%

Volatility

SNDK vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) has a higher volatility of 44.94% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 23.48%. This indicates that SNDK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNDKNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.94%

23.48%

+21.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.82%

63.97%

+13.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.90%

76.98%

+31.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.26%

89.07%

+13.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.26%

89.07%

+13.19%

Dividends

SNDK vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNDK nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNDK and NRGU have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNDK has higher volatility (44.94%) compared to NRGU (23.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNDK dropped -47.50% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

SNDK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (30.88 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNDK and NRGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer