PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNDK vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNDK vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNDK achieves a 734.15% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.69% return.


SNDK

1D
5.24%
1M
36.82%
YTD
734.15%
6M
860.37%
1Y
4,694.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDX

1D
2.97%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-6.69%
6M
-5.89%
1Y
50.59%
3Y*
38.96%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
13.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDK vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
734.15%356.50%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-6.69%111.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDK and GDX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNDK vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNDK
SNDK Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SNDK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDK Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDK Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNDK vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNDKGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+46.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.16

1.21

+0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

152.17

1.40

+150.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

461.00

3.87

+457.13

SNDK vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNDK Sharpe Ratio is 47.94, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNDK and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNDK vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDK drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDK and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNDKGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-80.34%

+32.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.34%

-36.28%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-30.91%

+30.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.74%

-40.41%

+26.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.32%

13.11%

-2.79%

Volatility

SNDK vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) has a higher volatility of 26.68% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 17.20%. This indicates that SNDK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNDKGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.68%

17.20%

+9.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.96%

39.15%

+32.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.48%

46.89%

+52.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.64%

36.74%

+60.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.64%

37.34%

+60.30%

Dividends

SNDK vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

SNDK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.79%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNDK and GDX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNDK has higher volatility (26.68%) compared to GDX (17.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNDK dropped -47.50% vs GDX's -80.34%.

SNDK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (47.94 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNDK and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer