PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNDK vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNDK vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNDK achieves a 591.72% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 13.35% return.


SNDK

1D
5.30%
1M
5.10%
YTD
591.72%
6M
628.26%
1Y
4,094.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COST

1D
0.30%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
13.35%
6M
10.14%
1Y
-3.42%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
22.05%
10Y*
22.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDK vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
591.72%388.44%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
13.35%-16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDK and COST is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

-0.07

Fundamentals

EPS

SNDK:

$29.70

COST:

$26.51

PE Ratio

SNDK:

55.29

COST:

36.77

PS Ratio

SNDK:

18.90

COST:

1.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNDK:

$13.18B

COST:

$293.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNDK:

$7.39B

COST:

$11.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNDK:

$5.37B

COST:

$12.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNDK vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNDK
SNDK Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SNDK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDK Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDK Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNDK vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNDKCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+42.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.12

0.98

+1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

132.65

-0.22

+132.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

403.29

-0.51

+403.80

SNDK vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNDK Sharpe Ratio is 42.05, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNDK and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNDKCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.05

-0.18

+42.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

15.00

0.59

+14.41

Drawdowns

SNDK vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDK drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDK and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNDKCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-53.39%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.34%

-15.38%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.35%

-10.93%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-13.36%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.29%

7.15%

+3.14%

Volatility

SNDK vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) has a higher volatility of 28.48% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.71%. This indicates that SNDK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNDKCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.48%

7.71%

+20.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.36%

14.53%

+56.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.05%

18.79%

+80.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.38%

22.71%

+74.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.38%

21.95%

+75.43%

Dividends

SNDK vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SNDK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SNDK vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sandisk Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
5.95B
70.53B
(SNDK) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SNDK vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sandisk Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
78.4%
-25.1%
Portfolio components
SNDK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.66B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.4%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

SNDK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported an operating income of 4.11B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.1%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

SNDK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported a net income of 3.62B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 60.8%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNDK and COST have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNDK has higher volatility (28.48%) compared to COST (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNDK dropped -47.50% vs COST's -53.39%.

SNDK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (42.05 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNDK and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer