SNAP vs. RDFN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN).

Performance

SNAP vs. RDFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SNAP vs. RDFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SNAP Snap Inc.	-43.00%	-25.07%	-36.39%	89.16%	-80.97%	-6.07%	206.61%	196.37%	-62.29%	5.79%
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-44.06%	224.65%	46.81%	-54.02%	44.33%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) SNAP : $5.93B RDFN : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) SNAP : $3.26B RDFN : $364.02M
EBITDA (TTM) SNAP : -$169.31M RDFN : -$129.82M

Returns By Period

SNAP

• 1D: 14.43%
• 1M: -11.71%
• YTD: -43.00%
• 6M: -40.34%
• 1Y: -47.19%
• 3Y*: -25.69%
• 5Y*: -39.01%
• 10Y*: —

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SNAP vs. RDFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAP

SNAP Risk / Return Rank: 10
SNAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SNAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SNAP Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SNAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SNAP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAP vs. RDFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNAP	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.04	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNAP	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between SNAP and RDFN is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SNAP vs. RDFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAP nor RDFN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAP	RDFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.47%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.33%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNAP	RDFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.03%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.78%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.04%	—	—

Financials