PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAG vs. SBTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAG vs. SBTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -54.52% return, which is significantly higher than SBTU's -70.50% return.


SNAG

1D
10.73%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-54.52%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBTU

1D
8.06%
1M
-46.10%
YTD
-70.50%
6M
-82.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAG vs. SBTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNAG and SBTU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAG vs. SBTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SNAG vs. SBTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNAGSBTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

-0.61

-0.05

Drawdowns

SNAG vs. SBTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, smaller than the maximum SBTU drawdown of -91.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and SBTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAGSBTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.94%

-91.09%

+9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.45%

-90.38%

+28.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.49%

-68.68%

+14.19%

Volatility

SNAG vs. SBTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAGSBTUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.01%

161.42%

-42.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

119.01%

161.42%

-42.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.01%

161.42%

-42.41%

SNAG vs. SBTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SBTU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAG vs. SBTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAG nor SBTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAG and SBTU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.

SNAG and SBTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tuttle Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 1.50% for SBTU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAG and SBTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer