SNAG vs. SBTU
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SNAG is passively managed, while SBTU is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for SBTU.
Performance
SNAG vs. SBTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SNAG having a -74.12% return and SBTU slightly lower at -74.51%.
SNAG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -23.68%
- 6M
- -74.71%
- YTD
- -74.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU
- 1D
- 6.49%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- 6M
- -79.46%
- YTD
- -74.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNAG vs. SBTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -74.12% | 9.86% |
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -74.51% | -9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and SBTU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. SBTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. SBTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, smaller than the maximum SBTU drawdown of -94.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and SBTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | SBTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -94.22% | +12.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.06% | -91.68% | +13.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.72% | -71.44% | +13.72% |
Volatility
SNAG vs. SBTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | SBTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.09% | 159.15% | -39.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 120.09% | 159.15% | -39.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.09% | 159.15% | -39.06% |
SNAG vs. SBTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SBTU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAG vs. SBTU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAG nor SBTU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and SBTU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SNAG and SBTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tuttle Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 1.50% for SBTU.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and SBTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer