SNAG vs. SBTU
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SNAG is passively managed, while SBTU is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for SBTU.
Performance
SNAG vs. SBTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -54.52% return, which is significantly higher than SBTU's -70.50% return.
SNAG
- 1D
- 10.73%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -54.52%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU
- 1D
- 8.06%
- 1M
- -46.10%
- YTD
- -70.50%
- 6M
- -82.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNAG vs. SBTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -54.52% | 11.30% |
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -70.50% | -3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and SBTU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. SBTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAG | SBTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | -0.61 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. SBTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, smaller than the maximum SBTU drawdown of -91.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and SBTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | SBTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -91.09% | +9.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.45% | -90.38% | +28.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.49% | -68.68% | +14.19% |
Volatility
SNAG vs. SBTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | SBTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.01% | 161.42% | -42.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 119.01% | 161.42% | -42.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 119.01% | 161.42% | -42.41% |
SNAG vs. SBTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SBTU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAG vs. SBTU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAG nor SBTU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and SBTU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SNAG and SBTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tuttle Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 1.50% for SBTU.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and SBTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer