SNAG vs. QTJL
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SNAG is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
SNAG vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -54.52% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.18% return.
SNAG
- 1D
- 10.73%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -54.52%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 20.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNAG vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -54.52% | 11.30% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.18% | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and QTJL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
SNAG
QTJL
SNAG vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 0.52 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -33.40% | -48.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.45% | 0.00% | -61.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.49% | -7.93% | -46.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
SNAG vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.01% | 9.99% | +109.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 119.01% | 20.42% | +98.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 119.01% | 20.42% | +98.59% |
SNAG vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAG vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAG nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and QTJL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.
SNAG and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer