PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist (OM3M.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNA2.DE achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than OM3M.DE's 0.54% return.


SNA2.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.93%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.09%
1Y
1.39%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*

OM3M.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.54%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
1.18%
3Y*
0.55%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SNA2.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.82%-5.92%6.08%0.13%-6.90%5.64%-2.06%-3.72%
OM3M.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.54%-4.89%7.50%0.56%-3.84%5.66%-2.73%-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SNA2.DE and OM3M.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019

0.95

The correlation between SNA2.DE and OM3M.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNA2.DE
SNA2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SNA2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

OM3M.DE
OM3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
OM3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OM3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OM3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OM3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
OM3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist (OM3M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNA2.DEOM3M.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.03

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

0.20

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

0.51

+0.14

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNA2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the OM3M.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNA2.DE and OM3M.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNA2.DEOM3M.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

0.16

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.14

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.25

-0.37

Drawdowns

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNA2.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than OM3M.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA2.DE and OM3M.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNA2.DEOM3M.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.70%

-13.79%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

-4.06%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

-9.94%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.01%

-12.25%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.15%

-7.74%

-6.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.16%

-6.62%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.63%

+0.06%

Volatility

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist (OM3M.DE) at 0.81%. This indicates that SNA2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OM3M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNA2.DEOM3M.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.81%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

3.63%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

5.25%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

7.56%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.95%

7.18%

+0.77%

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNA2.DE and OM3M.DE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SNA2.DE vs. OM3M.DE - Dividend Comparison

SNA2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than OM3M.DE's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OM3M.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist
3.38%3.78%3.19%2.59%1.31%0.83%1.81%2.08%
SNA2.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
3.50%3.74%3.48%3.07%1.40%0.72%1.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SNA2.DE and OM3M.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SNA2.DE and OM3M.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

SNA2.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Core Bond, while OM3M.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNA2.DE and OM3M.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer