SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE
SNA2.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist) and PR1S.DE (Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Government Bonds funds - SNA2.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury Core Bond while PR1S.DE tracks the Solactive US Treasury Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNA2.DE returned 0.24%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for PR1S.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNA2.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1S.DE.
Performance
SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNA2.DE achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than PR1S.DE's 1.04% return.
SNA2.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 1.09%
- 3Y*
- -0.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
PR1S.DE
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- 0.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNA2.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.82% | -5.92% | 6.08% | 0.13% | -6.90% | 5.64% | -2.06% | -3.72% |
PR1S.DE Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.04% | -5.53% | 6.59% | 0.45% | -6.79% | 5.94% | -1.86% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNA2.DE and PR1S.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SNA2.DE and PR1S.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SNA2.DE
PR1S.DE
SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNA2.DE | PR1S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.05 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 0.40 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 1.01 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNA2.DE | PR1S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.30 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.07 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | -0.09 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNA2.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, roughly equal to the maximum PR1S.DE drawdown of -17.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA2.DE and PR1S.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNA2.DE | PR1S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.70% | -17.15% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | -4.05% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.19% | -11.04% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.01% | -12.84% | -0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.15% | -12.54% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.16% | -10.33% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.62% | +0.07% |
Volatility
SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE) at 0.86%. This indicates that SNA2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNA2.DE | PR1S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 0.86% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.78% | 3.80% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49% | 5.49% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 8.02% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.95% | 8.93% | -0.98% |
SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNA2.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1S.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Dividend Comparison
SNA2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than PR1S.DE's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR1S.DE Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) | 3.19% | 3.22% | 2.83% | 2.36% | 1.91% | 1.73% | 2.14% | 1.50% |
SNA2.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist | 3.50% | 3.74% | 3.48% | 3.07% | 1.40% | 0.72% | 1.32% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SNA2.DE and PR1S.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PR1S.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1S.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SNA2.DE.
SNA2.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Core Bond, while PR1S.DE tracks Solactive US Treasury Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SNA2.DE and 0.05% for PR1S.DE.
Find the right allocation for SNA2.DE and PR1S.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer