OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist (OM3M.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE).
OM3M.DE and CEMF.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OM3M.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 3-7 Year. It was launched on Jul 10, 2018. CEMF.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2024. Both OM3M.DE and CEMF.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OM3M.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.97% | 0.58% |
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -0.73% | 2.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OM3M.DE achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than CEMF.DE's -0.73% return.
OM3M.DE
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- -3.79%
- 3Y*
- 1.09%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMF.DE
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OM3M.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
OM3M.DE
CEMF.DE
OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist (OM3M.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OM3M.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OM3M.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.62 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between OM3M.DE and CEMF.DE is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Dividend Comparison
OM3M.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OM3M.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist | 3.36% | 3.78% | 3.19% | 2.59% | 1.31% | 0.83% | 1.81% | 2.08% |
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OM3M.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, which is greater than CEMF.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OM3M.DE and CEMF.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OM3M.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.79% | -3.14% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -2.29% | -5.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -0.81% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | — | — |
Volatility
OM3M.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OM3M.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.97% | 4.42% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 4.42% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 4.42% | +2.82% |