PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNA vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNA vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNA achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -2.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SNA having a 12.41% annualized return and IAU not far behind at 12.31%.


SNA

1D
0.73%
1M
8.47%
YTD
13.93%
6M
11.91%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
12.41%

IAU

1D
0.08%
1M
-7.39%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNA vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
13.93%4.28%20.67%29.70%8.91%28.83%4.03%19.54%-14.86%3.64%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.44%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SNA and IAU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2005

0.02

The correlation between SNA and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (10 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNA vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNA
SNA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNA vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNAIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

0.99

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

2.83

+4.67

SNA vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNA and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNA vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNA drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.76%

-45.14%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-24.40%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-24.40%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-24.40%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

-24.40%

-22.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-22.03%

+21.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.87%

-15.97%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

8.47%

-5.11%

Volatility

SNA vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is 5.51%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that SNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

7.70%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

23.94%

-9.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

27.17%

-5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.91%

18.16%

+5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.18%

16.02%

+11.16%

Dividends

SNA vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

SNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
2.44%2.57%2.27%2.33%2.57%2.37%2.61%2.32%2.35%1.69%1.48%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNA and IAU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to SNA (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNA dropped -65.76% vs IAU's -45.14%.

SNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNA and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer