SMZ vs. YXI
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - SMZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while YXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). Both are passively managed. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YXI.
Performance
SMZ vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 7.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -12.91%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 0.78%
- 3Y*
- -9.91%
- 5Y*
- -5.56%
- 10Y*
- -7.95%
- ALL TIME*
- -8.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $795.18K | $775.91K | $1.24M | |
| $27.49K | $29.99K | $33.82K |
SMZ vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | -1.46% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 8.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and YXI is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
SMZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YXI
SMZ vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, roughly equal to the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -81.15% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.42% | -78.56% | +17.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.92% | -54.51% | +13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.08% | — |
Volatility
SMZ vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.99% | 21.18% | +167.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 31.28% | +157.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 27.47% | +161.52% |
SMZ vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMZ vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.71% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and YXI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YXI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YXI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.
SMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YXI is China Equities. SMZ tracks NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 0.95% for YXI.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer