PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMZ vs. ORCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMZ vs. ORCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMZ

1D
-0.22%
1M
-6.34%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ORCS

1D
2.16%
1M
29.15%
6M
20.88%
YTD
18.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMZ vs. ORCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMZ and ORCS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMZ vs. ORCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMZ vs. ORCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMZ vs. ORCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, which is greater than ORCS's maximum drawdown of -50.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and ORCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMZORCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.30%

-50.25%

-27.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.15%

-15.50%

-43.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.88%

-16.45%

-22.43%

Volatility

SMZ vs. ORCS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMZORCSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.85%

59.53%

+128.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.85%

59.53%

+128.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.85%

59.53%

+128.32%

SMZ vs. ORCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ORCS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMZ vs. ORCS - Dividend Comparison

SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ORCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.


PositionTTM2025
ORCS
Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF
1.21%0.26%
SMZ
Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMZ and ORCS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ORCS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ORCS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.

ORCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 0.97% for ORCS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMZ and ORCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer