SMYY vs. NVDY
SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) and NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMYY is a Options Trading fund managed by GraniteShares, while NVDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDY.
Performance
SMYY vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 10.54% return.
SMYY
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -10.23%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDY
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 23.01%
- 3Y*
- 50.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMYY vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | -6.40% | -27.35% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.54% | 3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMYY and NVDY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMYY vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank
SMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVDY
SMYY vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMYY | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMYY vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, which is greater than NVDY's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and NVDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMYY | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.49% | -34.08% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.49% | -8.74% | -28.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.31% | -6.30% | -20.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.31% | — |
Volatility
SMYY vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMYY | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.27% | 28.69% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 37.99% | -6.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 37.99% | -6.72% |
SMYY vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMYY vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison
SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 198.81%, more than NVDY's 67.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 67.37% | 83.10% | 83.65% | 22.32% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 198.81% | 53.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMYY and NVDY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.
SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 198.81%, compared with 67.37% for NVDY.
SMYY is categorized as Options Trading, while NVDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.99% for NVDY.
Find the right allocation for SMYY and NVDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer