SMYY vs. APRQ
SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) and APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. SMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRQ.
Performance
SMYY vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMYY
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- -8.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMYY vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 0.45% |
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMYY vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMYY | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.98 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SMYY vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and APRQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMYY | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.84% | 0.00% | -36.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.74% | 0.00% | -28.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.15% | 0.00% | -25.15% |
Volatility
SMYY vs. APRQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMYY | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.69% | 0.00% | +32.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 0.00% | +32.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 0.00% | +32.69% |
SMYY vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMYY vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison
SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 146.89%, while APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 146.89% | 53.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.
SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 146.89%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.79% for APRQ.
Find the right allocation for SMYY and APRQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer