PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMYY vs. APRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMYY vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 9.34% return.


SMYY

1D
-0.53%
1M
3.58%
YTD
6.70%
6M
-8.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRP

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.87%
YTD
9.34%
6M
10.32%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMYY vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMYY and APRP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMYY vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMYY

APRP
APRP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMYY vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMYY vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMYYAPRPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.98

1.36

-2.34

Drawdowns

SMYY vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than APRP's maximum drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and APRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMYYAPRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.84%

-13.66%

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.74%

-0.19%

-28.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.15%

-1.23%

-23.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

Volatility

SMYY vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMYYAPRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.69%

4.33%

+28.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.69%

9.49%

+23.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

9.49%

+23.20%

SMYY vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMYY vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 146.89%, while APRP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMYY and APRP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.

SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 146.89%, compared with 0.00% for APRP.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.50% for APRP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMYY and APRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer