PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMVTX vs. NFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMVTX vs. NFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMVTX achieves a 23.44% return, which is significantly higher than NFFFX's 15.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SMVTX has outperformed NFFFX with an annualized return of 12.81%, while NFFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.46% annualized return.


SMVTX

1D
-1.36%
1M
3.04%
YTD
23.44%
6M
21.33%
1Y
42.76%
3Y*
24.18%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
12.81%

NFFFX

1D
-3.01%
1M
2.41%
YTD
15.18%
6M
15.22%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMVTX vs. NFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMVTX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund
23.44%17.58%18.93%10.94%-13.89%29.15%-1.19%33.14%-8.01%11.69%
NFFFX
American Funds New World Fund
15.18%28.52%6.78%16.11%-21.86%4.98%25.17%27.89%-12.08%32.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SMVTX and NFFFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2008

0.76

The correlation between SMVTX and NFFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMVTX vs. NFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMVTX
SMVTX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SMVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NFFFX
NFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMVTX vs. NFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMVTXNFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.20

2.54

+3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.44

10.13

+12.31

SMVTX vs. NFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the NFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMVTX and NFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMVTX vs. NFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMVTX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, which is greater than NFFFX's maximum drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVTX and NFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMVTXNFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.72%

-50.17%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-13.01%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-15.05%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-33.48%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.45%

-33.48%

-11.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-3.01%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-9.79%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.25%

-1.27%

Volatility

SMVTX vs. NFFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) is 6.33%, while American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that SMVTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMVTXNFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

8.23%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

14.61%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

16.49%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

15.78%

+4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.65%

16.22%

+4.43%

SMVTX vs. NFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMVTX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NFFFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMVTX vs. NFFFX - Dividend Comparison

SMVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.14%, more than NFFFX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFFFX
American Funds New World Fund
5.22%6.01%4.01%2.78%1.21%7.23%0.35%3.95%2.62%2.17%1.28%0.94%
SMVTX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund
14.14%16.44%15.96%1.16%6.75%18.53%2.52%5.82%14.47%20.86%3.61%7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMVTX and NFFFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFFFX has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to SMVTX (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMVTX dropped -54.72% vs NFFFX's -50.17%.

SMVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMVTX and NFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer