SMVTX vs. FSOAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX).
SMVTX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Nov 30, 2001. FSOAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
SMVTX vs. FSOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMVTX vs. FSOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund | 9.20% | 17.58% | 18.93% | 10.94% | -13.89% | 29.15% | -1.19% | 33.14% | -8.01% | 11.69% |
FSOAX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A | 3.38% | -2.17% | -3.64% | 20.24% | -7.61% | 32.95% | 7.95% | 34.16% | -17.02% | 17.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMVTX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than FSOAX's 3.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SMVTX has outperformed FSOAX with an annualized return of 11.36%, while FSOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.
SMVTX
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 34.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
FSOAX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- 3.38%
- 6M
- -3.21%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMVTX vs. FSOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMVTX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FSOAX's 1.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMVTX vs. FSOAX — Risk / Return Rank
SMVTX
FSOAX
SMVTX vs. FSOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMVTX | FSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | 0.41 | +1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 0.71 | +1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.10 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 0.50 | +1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 1.81 | +10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMVTX | FSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 0.41 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.20 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.37 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.38 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMVTX and FSOAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMVTX vs. FSOAX - Dividend Comparison
SMVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.05%, while FSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund | 15.05% | 16.44% | 15.96% | 1.16% | 6.75% | 18.53% | 2.52% | 5.82% | 14.47% | 20.86% | 3.61% | 7.05% |
FSOAX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.90% | 2.43% | 8.70% | 0.82% | 5.59% | 17.03% | 7.64% | 22.64% | 1.10% |
Drawdowns
SMVTX vs. FSOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMVTX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum FSOAX drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVTX and FSOAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMVTX | FSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.72% | -70.02% | +15.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -15.26% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -35.33% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.45% | -47.99% | +2.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -17.87% | +13.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -10.00% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 4.24% | -1.24% |
Volatility
SMVTX vs. FSOAX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX) at 5.24%. This indicates that SMVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMVTX | FSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 5.24% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 16.23% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 24.58% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 21.20% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 22.24% | -1.65% |